[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070318102252.GA11201@osiris.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:22:52 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/15] KVM userspace interface updates
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:20:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >>This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will
> >>be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending
> >>the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness
> >>concerns.
> > [...]
> >But the general question is: do you still plan to switch to a syscall
> >interface?
>
> I don't have any present plans for that. Maybe when the interface starts
> to evolve at a slower pace, or if it is shown to be significantly faster.
>
> Not that interface stabilization here doesn't mean a freeze; it means that
> backwards compatibility starts when this gets merged.
If the interface is considered to be stable you can get rid of the
KVM_GET_API_VERSION ioctl, since the version can't change anymore, right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists