[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319122252.GA12029@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:22:53 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 2] block_page_mkwrite() Implementation V2
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:11:31PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I've got the patches in -mm now. I hope they will get merged when the
> the next window opens.
>
> I didn't submit the ->page_mkwrite conversion yet, because I didn't
> have any callers to look at. It is is slightly less trivial than for
> nopage and nopfn, so having David's block_page_mkwrite is helpful.
Yes. I was just wondering whether it makes more sense to do this
functionality directly ontop of ->fault instead of converting i over
real soon.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists