[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319184137.GB10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:41:37 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeremy@...p.org,
mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
zach@...are.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to make them patchable
* Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@...ssion.com) wrote:
> Is it truly critical to inline any of these instructions?
I don't have any current measurements. But we'd been aiming
at getting irq_{en,dis}able to a simple memory write to pda.
But simplicity, maintenance, etc. win over trimming a couple
cycles, so still worth real look.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists