[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070319225858.GK10459@waste.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:58:59 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Tasos Parisinos <t.parisinos@...ensis.com>
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] crypto API: RSA algorithm patch (kernel version 2.6.20.1)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 06:22:15PM +0200, Tasos Parisinos wrote:
> +static inline _i32 rsa_max(_i32 x, _i32 y)
> +{
> + return (x > y)? x: y;
> +}
We've got a max() already. Use tabs.
> +
> +/*
> + * Module loading callback function
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative value indicating error
> + */
This comment is not very useful.
> +static _err __init rsa_load(void)
> +{
> + _u32 i;
Can we use int and u32 instead of _err and _u32, please?
> + _err retval = RSA_NO_ERR;
And 0.
> + /* Pre-allocate some auxilliary mpis */
> + rsa_echo("Preallocating %lu bytes for auxilliary operands\n",
> + RSA_AUX_SIZE * RSA_AUX_COUNT * sizeof(_u32));
And printk.
> + memset(&aux, 0, sizeof(aux));
> + for(i = 0; i < RSA_AUX_COUNT; i++) {
> + retval = rsa_mpi_alloc(&aux[i], RSA_AUX_SIZE);
kmalloc, please? RSA_AUX_SIZE appears to be in bytes.
> + if(retval < 0)
We use "for (" and "if (" so they don't look like function calls.
> + goto rollback;
> + }
> +
> + rsa_echo("RSA cipher algorithm module initialized\n");
> + return RSA_NO_ERR;
> +
> +/* Free all allocated resources if any errors occur */
> +rollback:
> + for(i = 0; i < RSA_AUX_COUNT; i++)
> + rsa_mpi_free(aux[i]);
kfree()
> +/*
> + * Preallocate an mpi. The allocated mpi will be all-zeroed and not
> + * canonicalized.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative value indicating error
> + *
> + * @n: pointer pointer to the allocated mpi
> + * @limbs: number of allocated limbs (32 bit digits)
> + */
> +static _err rsa_mpi_alloc(mpi ** n, _i32 limbs)
Kerneldoc style is "function_name - short description". We write
pointers as "mpi **n". These things probably all want to be named
mpi_* rather than rsa_mpi_*, as they're not specific to the RSA algorithm.
> +{
> + mpi * handle;
And here.
> + rsa_debug("%s: kzalloc failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
printk.
> +static _err rsa_mpi_init(mpi ** n, _u8 * str, _u32 size, _u32 xtra)
If str is an actual string, use char *str.
> + /* Allocate space for the mpi and its data */
> + s = (size / 4) + ((size % 4)? 1: 0);
Uhhh.. (size + 1) / 4?
> + retval = rsa_mpi_alloc(n, s + xtra);
Is this not in bytes?
> + /* Copy the data */
> + for(i = size - 1, j = 0; i >= 0; i--, j++)
> + buf[j / 4] |= ((_u32)str[i] << ((j % 4) * 8));
Ew.
> + /* Zero the xtra limbs */
> + else if(size < handle->size)
> + for(i = size; i < s; i++)
> + buf[i] = 0;
memset?
> + return RSA_ERR_INVARG;
-EINVAL
> + buf = (*n)->data;
> + for(i = size - 1, j = 0; i >= 0; i--, j++)
> + buf[j / 4] |= ((_u32)str[i] << ((j % 4) * 8));
That mess looks familiar.
> +#define RSA_AUX_COUNT CONFIG_RSA_AUXCOUNT
> +#define RSA_AUX_SIZE CONFIG_RSA_AUXSIZE
Just use the config value.
> +#define RSA_MAX_U32 0xFFFFFFFF
I'm sure we've got this somewhere.
> +#define RSA_NO_ERR 0
> +#define RSA_ERR_INVARG -1
> +#define RSA_ERR_NOMEM -2
0, -EINVAL, -ENOMEM.
> +#define true 0x01
> +#define false 0x00
Ew.
> +/* Mpi utility functions */
> +static _err rsa_mpi_alloc(mpi **, _i32);
> +static void rsa_mpi_free(mpi *);
> +static _err rsa_mpi_init(mpi **, _u8 *, _u32, _u32);
> +static _err rsa_mpi_resize(mpi **, _i32, _u8);
> +static _err rsa_mpi_set(mpi **, _u8 *, _u32);
> +static inline _err rsa_mpi_copy(mpi **, mpi *);
> +static void rsa_mpi_print(mpi *, _u8);
Why are you declaring a bunch of static functions in a header file?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists