| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070320093834.GO22880@mail.muni.cz> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:38:34 +0100 From: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@...l.muni.cz> To: David Schwartz <davids@...master.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: ex-upload Hello, >> How can I put delay between subsequent msg sends to achieve desired >> packet rate without loses, e.g., 3.5Gbps without bursts? Even nanosleep() >> with the lowest possible delay seems to be too much delay. Busy loop with >> clock_gettime(3) works OK on SMP boxes, but on UP it causes problems. > > Why do you want to avoid bursts? You're going to be bursting between 10Gb/s > and 0 anyway. It is because bursts above 5.5Gbps cannot be received by the peer. The peer is only able to receive bursts up to 5.5Gbps whereas the sender is able to burst up to 9.9Gbps. > It sounds like you're deliberately putting impossible requirements on > yourself choosing the worst possible protocol and demanding the pacing be > perfect. I don't think the technology to do that is here yet, but why would > you possibly need it? it is video transmission encapsulated in RTP over UDP. I do not know whether there are any other possibilities that would work also on Mac OS or FreeBSD. (Please Cc me) -- Lukáš Hejtmánek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists