[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070320180857.GC2593@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:08:57 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...il.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread_should_stop_check_freeze (was: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/7] Freezer: Remove PF_NOFREEZE from rcutorture thread)
Hi!
> > Do not do it, then. Confusion it causes is not worth saving one line
> > of code.
> >
> > You do less typing, but the resulting code is _less_ readable, not
> > more.
>
> Then please document it _clearly_ with the kthread code somewhere. The
> reason I brought this up is I had no idea we had to put the freezer gunk
> in all kernel thread loops and Ive been writing kernel threads for years.
This is in Doc*/power/kernel_threads.txt:
KERNEL THREADS
Freezer
Upon entering a suspended state the system will freeze all
tasks. This is done by delivering pseudosignals. This affects
kernel threads, too. To successfully freeze a kernel thread
the thread has to check for the pseudosignal and enter the
refrigerator. Code to do this looks like this:
do {
hub_events();
wait_event_interruptible(khubd_wait,
!list_empty(&hub_event_list));
try_to_freeze();
} while (!signal_pending(current));
...do you know about better place?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists