[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46003BF1.4090601@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:54:25 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, anthony@...emonkey.ws, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops
callsites to make them patchable
Andi Kleen wrote:
> One thing I was pondering was to replace the expensive popfs with
>
> bt $IF,(%rsp)
> jnc 1f
> sti
> 1:
>
> But would be mostly a P4 optimization again and I'm not 100% sure it is
> worth it.
>
Worth it on 32-bit. On AMD64, probably not. On Intel 64-bit, maybe,
but less important than in P4 days.
This could change character completely if used at the tail of a function
where you now have
sti; 1: ret
Which generates an interrupt holdoff on the ret, an unusual thing to do.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists