[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17920.30274.608018.34484@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:03:14 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
anthony@...emonkey.ws, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops
callsites to make them patchable
Linus Torvalds writes:
> We should just do this natively. There's been several tests over the years
> saying that it's much more efficient to do sti/cli as a simple store, and
> handling the "oops, we got an interrupt while interrupts were disabled" as
> a special case.
>
> I have this dim memory that ARM has done it that way for a long time
> because it's so expensive to do a "real" cli/sti.
>
> And I think -rt does it for other reasons. It's just more flexible.
64-bit powerpc does this now as well.
Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists