lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:03:02 -0400 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] split file and anonymous page queues #3 Rik van Riel wrote: > Nikita Danilov wrote: > >> Probably I am missing something, but I don't see how that can help. For >> example, suppose (for simplicity) that we have swappiness of 100%, and >> that fraction of referenced anon pages gets slightly less than of file >> pages. get_scan_ratio() increases anon_percent, and shrink_zone() starts >> scanning anon queue more aggressively. As a result, pages spend less >> time there, and have less chance of ever being accessed, reducing >> fraction of referenced anon pages further, and triggering further >> increase in the amount of scanning, etc. Doesn't this introduce positive >> feed-back loop? > > It's a possibility, but I don't think it will be much of an > issue in practice. > > If it is, we can always use refaults as a correcting > mechanism - which would have the added benefit of being > able to do streaming IO without putting any pressure on > the active list, essentially clock-pro replacement with > just some tweaks to shrink_list()... As an aside, due to the use-once algorithm file pages are at a natural disadvantage already. I believe it would be really hard to construct a workload where anon pages suffer the positive feedback loop you describe... -- Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group calls the other unpatriotic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists