[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46012E1A.3030309@sciensis.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:07:38 +0200
From: Tasos Parisinos <t.parisinos@...ensis.com>
To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu>
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] crypto API: RSA algorithm patch (kernel
version 2.6.20.1)
> On Wed, March 21, 2007 10:15, Tasos Parisinos wrote:
>
>> Protecting a TripleDES key in high security standards is not as
>> simple as making the kernel read
>> protected, you need a whole lot and
>> that also means hardware (cryptomemories e.t.c)
>> So you forget about all this overhead when you use assymetric
>>
>
> Ah, you're talking about fishing the key out of RAM here, right?
> My point stays the same for that: If you can't read protect the
> kernel RAM, small chance you can write protect it. And then they
> can just bypass all signature checking you put in it anyway.
>
How can one tamper (write) the kernel memory of a booted and running kernel
without using an exploitable bug?
I mean, you can't mess with the bzImage on flash, the secure bootloader
boots it without
letting someone alter the (non crypto-) memory while loading the bzImage
on it, and then
no-one can run something that will tamper the system or write anywhere
on kernel memory
without exploiting a bug
I mean, am i missing something here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists