[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703210737400.1573@graphe.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] SLAB : [NUMA] keep nodeid in struct page instead
of struct slab
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In order to avoid a cache miss in kmem_cache_free() on NUMA and reduce hot path length, we could exploit the following common facts.
>
> 1) MAX_NUMNODES <= 64
MAX_NUMNODES == 1024 on IA64 and may be on x86_64 in the future.
> 2) alignment of 'struct kmem_cache *' can be >= 64
>
> The following patch changes the page->lru.next to contain not only the
> 'struct kmem_cache *' pointer, but also the nodeid in the low order
> bits.
Nack.
I would suggest you audit slab and make sure that we never fall back and
always enter a slab on the node of page_to_nid(page). If
all allocations use GFP_THISNODE then you should be safe and then we can
remove the nodeid from the slab structure and simply use the available
node information in the page struct.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists