linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:39:20 -0400
From:	"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	"Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	"Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@...log.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"bert hubert" <bert.hubert@...herlabs.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch

On 3/21/07, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:06:58PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/blackfin/Kconfig   2007-03-21 14:38:42.000000000 +0800
> > +config BLACKFIN
> >  config BFIN
>
> Again, there's no reason to have both of these. Pick one and stick with
> it.

we're working on it ... not everything has been converted yet, thus
they're still both alive :/

> > +/* CSYNC implementation for C file */
> >  #if defined(ANOMALY_05000312) && defined(ANOMALY_05000244)
>
> Is there some reason these aren't config options? Perhaps an errata
> sub-menu might be more intuitive.

there is ... in the Kconfig, you select the CPU and the silicon
version ... we then have a header file that determines which anomalies
need to be worked around since the anomaly/silicon binding is static
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/