linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] split file and anonymous page queues #3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4601598A.7060904@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:12:58 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC:	Nikita Danilov <nikita@...sterfs.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] split file and anonymous page queues #3

Rik van Riel wrote:
> Nikita Danilov wrote:
> 
>> Probably I am missing something, but I don't see how that can help. For
>> example, suppose (for simplicity) that we have swappiness of 100%, and
>> that fraction of referenced anon pages gets slightly less than of file
>> pages. get_scan_ratio() increases anon_percent, and shrink_zone() starts
>> scanning anon queue more aggressively. As a result, pages spend less
>> time there, and have less chance of ever being accessed, reducing
>> fraction of referenced anon pages further, and triggering further
>> increase in the amount of scanning, etc. Doesn't this introduce positive
>> feed-back loop?
> 
> It's a possibility, but I don't think it will be much of an
> issue in practice.
> 
> If it is, we can always use refaults as a correcting
> mechanism - which would have the added benefit of being
> able to do streaming IO without putting any pressure on
> the active list, essentially clock-pro replacement with
> just some tweaks to shrink_list()...
> 

I think you're going to have to use refault rates. AIX 3.5 had
to add that. Something like:

if refault_rate(anonymous/mmap) > refault_rate(pagecache)
   drop a pagecache page
else
   drop either

You do have anonymous memory and mmapped executables in the same
queue, right?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/