[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070321172853.GB5233@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:28:53 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
> Quoting Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>:
> Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
>
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:41 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > a quick ping: on your box that doesnt resume - if you can log in over
> > > > the network after resume (or somehow run shell commands), does 'date'
> > > > advance properly or not? (or do you not get that far to be able to
> > > > tell?)
> > > >
> > > > Ingo
> > >
> > > I just retested - 'date' does not advance after resume for me.
> > > This is with NO_HZ *not* set.
> > > Sorry it took so long.
> >
> > Update: just re-tested with 2.6.21-rc4, same behaviour: date
> > does not advance after resume from ram.
>
> Can you get a full dmesg from boot to resume out of the box ?
>
> tglx
Here it is.
Symptoms:
1. after resume, takes up to 1 min to enable disk
2. date does not advance after resume
--
MST
View attachment "bootlog2" of type "text/plain" (97934 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists