[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0703211214ic7e42d2pa9452ef52b566fd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:14:29 -0400
From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: "Bob Copeland" <me@...copeland.com>
Cc: bryan.wu@...log.com, khali@...ux-fr.org,
"David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 4/4] Blackfin: on-chip Two Wire Interface I2C driver
On 3/21/07, Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com> wrote:
> > +config I2C_BLACKFIN_TWI
> > + tristate "Blackfin TWI I2C support"
> > + depends on I2C && (BF534 || BF536 || BF537)
> > + help
> > + This is the TWI I2C device driver for Blackfin 534/536/537.
> > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> > + will be called i2c-bfin-twi.
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but is there any reason to call it "Blackfin TWI"
> as opposed to just "Blackfin" since TWI and I2C mean the same thing?
> It lends itself to some redundancies such as:
>
> > + pr_info("I2C: Blackfin I2C TWI driver\n");
it reflects the hardware manual and all public Analog Devices
documentation ... the peripheral is always referred to as a "Two Wire
Interface that is fully compatible with the I2C standard" since using
the "I2C" term is not free
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists