linux-kernel - RE: Why is /dev on a different filesystem ? [Kernel 2.6.20.3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <050701c76bef$6d4c2110$4b00a8c0@donald>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:30:42 +0100
From:	"Paul Rolland" <rol@...917.net>
To:	<Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc:	"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Why is /dev on a different filesystem ? [Kernel 2.6.20.3]

> Might want to 'cat /proc/mounts', and ponder the fact that a 
> filesystem
> can be mounted and not listed in /etc/mtab, and then see if 
> your system
> has 'udev' installed and enabled.

Damn ! You're right :
cat /proc/mounts | grep dev
none /dev tmpfs rw 0 0

and no, I don't have any udev running, still can't stand it ;)

Thx for the pointer, I was too much trusting df :(

Regards,
Paul
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/