linux-kernel - RE: Why is /dev on a different filesystem ? [Kernel 2.6.20.3]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEPPCGAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:59:29 -0700
From:	"David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com>
To:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Why is /dev on a different filesystem ? [Kernel 2.6.20.3]

> So, obviously, /dev is on /, but the stat(2) says no.
> Who is right, and where is the bug ?
> 
> Kernel 2.4 had it right : /dev was on /, no doubt.

Have a look at the contents of /proc/mounts and all will be clear.

DS

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/