linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46019F67.3010300@google.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:11:03 -0700
From:	Ethan Solomita <solo@...gle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC:	akpm@...l.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
	Dave Chinner <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote:
> 
>>    Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns that
>> Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some
>> progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through.
> 
> Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as 
> soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit.

	I'm pinging to see if this has gotten anywhere. Are you ready to 
resubmit? Do we have the evidence to convince Andrew that the NFS issues 
are resolved and so this patch won't obscure anything?

	Thanks,
	-- Ethan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/