| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <jeslbyp9j6.fsf@sykes.suse.de> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:32:45 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> To: <rol@...917.net> Cc: "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Why is /dev on a different filesystem ? [Kernel 2.6.20.3] "Paul Rolland" <rol@...917.net> writes: > and df -a reports : > [root@...t-181 src]# df -a > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > /dev/hda1 7936256 3105556 4421048 42% / > proc 0 0 0 - /proc > sysfs 0 0 0 - /sys > devpts 0 0 0 - /dev/pts > tmpfs 517632 0 517632 0% /dev/shm > /dev/hda5 61787140 237360 58360480 1% /usr/local/witbe > /dev/hda2 4956316 142292 4558192 4% /var/log > none 0 0 0 - > /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc > > So, obviously, /dev is on /, but the stat(2) says no. > Who is right, and where is the bug ? Try cat /proc/mounts, apparently when /dev was mounted /etc/mtab wasn't updated appropriately. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@...e.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists