[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703210715.35898.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:15:35 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: Artur Skawina <art_k@...pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.31
Artur Skawina wrote:
> Al Boldi wrote:
> > --- sched.bak.c 2007-03-16 23:07:23.000000000 +0300
> > +++ sched.c 2007-03-19 23:49:40.000000000 +0300
> > @@ -938,7 +938,11 @@ static void activate_task(struct task_st
> > (now - p->timestamp) >> 20);
> > }
> >
> > - p->quota = rr_quota(p);
> > + /*
> > + * boost factor hardcoded to 5; adjust to your liking
> > + * higher means more likely to DoS
> > + */
> > + p->quota = rr_quota(p) + (((now - p->timestamp) >> 20) * 5);
> > p->prio = effective_prio(p);
> > p->timestamp = now;
> > __activate_task(p, rq);
>
> i've tried this and it lasted only a few minutes -- i was seeing
> mouse cursor stalls lasting almost 1s. i/o bound tasks starving X?
> After reverting the patch everything is smooth again.
This patch wasn't really meant for production, as any sleeping background
proc turned cpu-hog may DoS the system.
If you like to play with this, then you probably want to at least reset the
quota in its expiration.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists