[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070321222106.GF6057@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:21:06 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Code reordering in swsusp breaks suspend on SMP systems
Hi!
> Starting with 2.6.21-rc1 suspend to ram and disk doesn't work anymore on my system.
>
> I did a git-bisect and found that those commits break it:
>
> e3c7db621bed4afb8e231cb005057f2feb5db557 - [PATCH] [PATCH] PM: Change code ordering in main.c
> ed746e3b18f4df18afa3763155972c5835f284c5 - [PATCH] [PATCH] swsusp: Change code ordering in disk.c
> 259130526c267550bc365d3015917d90667732f1 - [PATCH] [PATCH] swsusp: Change code ordering in user.c
>
(Yep, it was in my "to analyze" queue).
> I already reported about it, but now i know the reason why suspend breaks.
>
> The problem is that both cpu_up/cpu_down were allowed to sleep until now,
> and it did work because those functions could be called only in process context
> (the one that writes to /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online) or idle thread that does smp_init()).
>
> But now they are called _after_ all tasks were suspended, so if cpu_down tries for example to take a lock
> that is taken by different process, it can't since the different proccess is frozen and can't release the lock.
>
Thanks for detailed explanation.
...but, on my machine suspend works ok in -rc4. I'm not seeing this.
...by design, "frozen" tasks must not hold any locks. If frozen task
holds a lock, that's a bug.
> Or, it is also possible to revert this change.
Are you using xfs?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists