[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070321225348.GO10459@waste.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:53:48 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pagetable_ops: Hugetlb character device example
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
> >> The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> >> enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
>
> Hello.
>
> My exit strategy was to make hugetlbfs an alias for ramfs when ramfs
> acquired the necessary functionality until expand-on-mmap() was merged.
> That would've allowed rm -rf fs/hugetlbfs/ outright. A compatibility
> wrapper for expand-on-mmap() around ramfs once ramfs acquires the
> necessary functionality is now the exit strategy.
Can you describe what ramfs needs here in a bit more detail?
If it's non-trivial, I'd rather see any new functionality go into
shmfs/tmpfs, as ramfs has done a good job at staying a minimal fs thus
far.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists