[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070321232433.GX943@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:24:33 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete obsolete RAW driver feature.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:13:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:10:50 +0000
> Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > This is a user visible API it is therefore not elligable for removal
> > > > anyway
> > >
> > > mutter.
> > >
> > > We've given people years of notice and _some_ applications have converted
> > > over to open("/dev/sda1", O_DIRECT), as they should.
> >
> > Linus said we don't break old applications by removing APIs. People
> > believe him.
> >
>
> That's just dogma, and not credible dogma at that. We regularly remove
> features and we have processes for this.
>
> There is no reason why we cannot, with sufficient effort, remove this
> driver at some time in the future.
Then a printk() on every open() should be enough. We've all been seeing
"Warning: tcpdump uses obsolete AF_PACKET"... and it finally disappeared.
It's a slow but necessary process IMHO. I agree with Alan that it's not
nice for the users to have sudden application errors without enough earlier
notification (not everybody reads sources for removal notifications).
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists