linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] : Is /proc/kcore still usefull and/or maintained ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:28:18 +0200
From:	Maxim <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] : Is /proc/kcore still usefull and/or maintained ?

On Thursday 22 March 2007 01:11:57 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Mar 21 2007 23:58, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > On i386 , 2.6.20 / 2.6.21-rc4 :
> >
> > # gdb vmlinux /proc/kcore
> > error
> > # file /proc/kcore
> > error
> 
> 00:11 ichi:/hld # file /proc/kcore
> /proc/kcore: ELF 32-bit LSB core file Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
> SVR4-style, from 'vmlinux'
> 00:11 ichi:/hld # hexdump -C /proc/kcore | head -n5
> 00000000  7f 45 4c 46 01 01 01 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |.ELF............|
> 00000010  04 00 03 00 01 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 34 00 00 00  |............4...|
> 00000020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  34 00 20 00 03 00 00 00  |........4. .....|
> 00000030  00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00  94 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> 00000040  00 00 00 00 a8 06 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
> 00:11 ichi:/hld # uname -rm
> 2.6.20.2 i686
> 
> >
> >
> > Apparently we can not llseek() anymore on this file (returns -EINVAL)
> >
> > On x86_64 2.6.20 it's working
> >
> > # file /proc/kcore
> > /proc/kcore: ELF 64-bit LSB core file x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style
> >
> >
> > On i386 2.6.14 it's working too.
> >
> > Eric
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
> 
> Jan

Hello, 

	I once had similar problem with /proc/kcore

	then gdb showed all zeros for all kernel memory,

	I had look at code , and I found that "Sparse memory model" was the problem, it doesn't say where kernel memory is 
	(I don't remember details now)
	I once choosed it just for experiment,  so I switched to Flat memory, and /proc/kcore works fine till then,

	I use 32 bit x86 kernel.

	Regards,
		Maxim Levitsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/