[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703202350280.28960@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: AIO, FIO and Threads ...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> I was looking at Jens FIO stuff, and I decided to cook a quick patch for
> FIO to support GUASI (Generic Userspace Asyncronous Syscall Interface):
>
> http://www.xmailserver.org/guasi-lib.html
>
> I then ran a few tests on my Dual Opteron 252 with SATA drives (sata_nv)
> and 8GB of RAM.
> Mind that I'm not FIO expert, like at all, but I got some interesting
> results when comparing GUASI with libaio at 8/1000/10000 depths.
> If I read those result correctly (Jens may help), GUASI output is more
> then double the libaio one.
> Lots of context switches, yes. But the throughput looks like 2+ times.
> Can someone try to repeat the measures and/or spot the error?
> Or tell me which other tests to run?
> This is kinda a suprise for me ...
Tests with block sizes bigger than 4KB bring libaio performance close to
GUASI, but not quite:
http://www.xmailserver.org/guasi-libaio-fio-results-1.txt
I dropped the last FIO+GUASI patch here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/fio-guasi-0.5.diff
And Jens FIO is here:
http://brick.kernel.dk/snaps/
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists