| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <20070322110058.GB23664@tatooine.rebelbase.local>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:00:58 +0100
From: markus reichelt <ml@...eichelt.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: max_loop limit
* Tomas M <tomas@...x.org> wrote:
> I hope you will like it and you will include it in kernel.
> Or, if not, maybe this patch will start some debate regarding
> the current insufficient limit of 255 loop devices.
255 loop devices are insufficient? What kind of scenario do you have
in mind?
--
left blank, right bald
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists