| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070322114144.GA29453@uranus.ravnborg.org> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:41:44 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...flux.net>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:17:00AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 12:59 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > I will give it a shot tonight. > > Thanks. I'll delete the syscalls-2.6.git tree now that you have it. > > > One issue I have with current approach is that the ARCH specific > > things are in a single .h file. > > Que? There aren't really any arch-specific things, except for a list of > syscalls to be ignored which are i386-specific. That's because we're > pulling in the 'master' system call list from asm-i386/unistd.h, and we > need to exclude some of those which we don't really need on other > architectures. Yep - realized this when I took a closer look. One thing striked my mind. It is correct that new things gets added to i386 first these days? To me it looks like x86_64 is growing larger than i386 among the developers these days so using asm-x86_64/unistd.h could be a better choice? Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists