[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174569275.1158.175.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:14:35 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Fix lseek on /proc/kcore
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:56 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...ru>
> ---
>
> fs/proc/inode.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/proc/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
> @@ -167,8 +167,9 @@ static loff_t proc_reg_llseek(struct fil
> llseek = pde->proc_fops->llseek;
> spin_unlock(&pde->pde_unload_lock);
>
> - if (llseek)
> - rv = llseek(file, offset, whence);
> + if (!llseek)
> + llseek = default_llseek;
> + rv = llseek(file, offset, whence);
>
this has potential impact way outside kcore......
did you audit all proc users to see if they can deal with lseek?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists