linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4602D137.4060402@lwfinger.net>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:55:51 -0500
From:	Larry Finger <larry.finger@...inger.net>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	Monakhov Dmitriy <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1

Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:23:06 -0500,
> 
> This would indicate that dev_uevent had been called. But how could
> kobject_uevent then return an error without moaning about an uevent()
> error code? Maybe the following debug patch could shed some light on
> this (all moaning is prefixed with kobject_uevent_env, so it should be
> easy to spot)...

I applied the debug patch, but I don't see any error codes being returned. This time I also got the
General Protection Faults. An excerpt of the log is attached.

Thanks,

Larry

View attachment "messages" of type "text/plain" (15128 bytes)