linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: null pointer dereference in cfq_dispatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070322192233.GA5873@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:22:34 +0100
From:	Johannes Weiner <hannes-kernel@...urebad.de>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: null pointer dereference in cfq_dispatch_requests (2.6.21-rc2 and 2.6.20)

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:42:35PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > index b6491c0..ca84f0b 100644
> > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -961,8 +961,8 @@ __cfq_dispatch_requests(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
> >  		/*
> >  		 * follow expired path, else get first next available
> >  		 */
> > -		if ((rq = cfq_check_fifo(cfqq)) == NULL)
> > -			rq = cfqq->next_rq;
> > +		if (!(rq = cfq_check_fifo(cfqq)) && !(rq = cfqq->next_rq))
> > +			break;
> 
> That still only hides a bug. It is illegal for ->next_rq to be NULL
> while the RB tree is non-empty.

As I noticed afterwards this isn't even the point where the NULL ptr is
dereferenced.  It must be in the next code-line, cfqd->queue or
cfqd->queue->elevator was NULL when the oops occured or am I wrong?

'Hannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/