linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:21:52 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	cpw@....com (Cliff Wickman)
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpusets/sched_domain reconciliation

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:14:35 -0600
cpw@....com (Cliff Wickman) wrote:

> This patch reconciles cpusets and sched_domains that get out of sync
> due to disabling and re-enabling of cpu's.

I get three-out-of-three rejects in cpuset.c.  I could fix them, but I
wouldn't be very confident that the result works at runtime.  2.6.20-rc6 was
a long time ago - please, always raise patches against the latest mainline
kernel (the daily git snapshot suffices).

Recursion is a big no-no in kernel.  Is there any way in which it can be
avoided?  Is Dinakar's implementation also recursive?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/