linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/21] MSI rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1174600936.10836.53.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:02:16 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	daniel.e.wolstenholme@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] MSI rework

> > i.e.  First the simple bug fixes that should purely be restructure of
> > msi.c with no affect on anything outside of it.
> > 
> > And then get into the architecture enhancements.
> 
> I agree, care to break these down into a smaller series of patches that
> can go into -mm for testing?

I don't see the point in breaking the serie... you can bisect half way
through if necessary... it's made of small patches that are done, afaik,
in such a way that the whole thing should still work at any level in the
serie.

The serie just expresses the dependency between them.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/