[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4602FF57.7030001@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:12:39 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: non-NUMA cache_free_alien() (was Re: [RFC] SLAB : NUMA cache_free_alien()
very expensive because of virt_to_slab(objp); nodeid = slabp->nodeid;)
Siddha, Suresh B a écrit :
> Christoph,
>
> While we are at this topic, recently I had reports that
> cache_free_alien() is costly on non NUMA platforms too (similar
> to the cache miss issues that Eric was referring to on NUMA)
> and the appended patch seems to fix it for non NUMA atleast.
>
> Appended patch gives a nice 1% perf improvement on non-NUMA platform
> with database workload.
>
> Please comment or Ack for mainline :)
I have one comment :)
> @@ -1394,6 +1394,9 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
> int order;
> int node;
>
> + if (num_online_nodes() == 1)
> + use_alien_caches = 0;
> +
Unfortunatly this part is wrong.
You should check num_possible_nodes(), or nr_node_ids (this one is cheaper,
its a variable instead of a function call)
I wonder if we could add a new SLAB_NUMA_BYPASS, so that we can declare some
kmem_cache as non NUMA aware (for example, I feel network skb dont need the
NUMA overhead)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists