[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174533874.2713.105.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:24:34 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define EFLAGS_IF
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:16 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> There is now more than one place where we use the fact that bit 9 of
> eflags is the interrupt-enabled flag, so define EFLAGS_IF. We make it
> 512 so it can be used in asm, too.
Belay this: there's a X86_EFLAGS_IF in asm/processor.h which we should
use. Will send patch.
Thanks to Jeremy Fitzhardinge for the clue.
Rusty.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists