[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4601CA9C.6050708@o2.pl>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 01:15:24 +0100
From: Artur Skawina <art_k@...pl>
To: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@...u.edu>
CC: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: rsdl improvements
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
>> I'm not sure this is going in the right direction... I'm writing
>> this while compiling a kernel w/ "nice -20 make -j2" and X is almost
>>
> Did you mean "nice -20"? If so, that should have slowed X quite a bit.
> Try "nice 19" instead.
i did try "nice --20" too :) Resulted in long X stalls, but i don't
think that's a reasonable load so I did not mention it.
"nice -20 cmd" runs cmd at nice==19.
Usage: nice [OPTION] [COMMAND [ARG]...]
Run COMMAND with an adjusted niceness, which affects process scheduling.
With no COMMAND, print the current niceness. Nicenesses range from
-20 (most favorable scheduling) to 19 (least favorable).
-n, --adjustment=N add integer N to the niceness (default 10)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists