linux-kernel - Re: [QUICKLIST 1/5] Quicklists for page table pages V4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070323112920.GR2986@holomorphy.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 04:29:20 -0700
From:	William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QUICKLIST 1/5] Quicklists for page table pages V4

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 11:48:48PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> afacit that two-year-old, totally-different patch has nothing to do with my
> repeatedly-asked question.  It appears to be consolidating three separate
> quicklist allocators into one common implementation.
> In an attempt to answer my own question (and hence to justify the retention
> of this custom allocator) I did this:
[... patch changing allocator alloc()/free() to bare page allocations ...]
> but it crashes early in the page allocator (i386) and I don't see why.  It
> makes me wonder if we have a use-after-free which is hidden by the presence
> of the quicklist buffering or something.

Sorry I flubbed the first message. Anyway this does mean something is
seriously wrong and needs to be debugged. Looking into it now.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/