[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070323214418.3F04.Y-GOTO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:54:29 +0900
From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 + 3 hot-fixes -- WARNING: could not find versions for .tmp_versions/built-in.mod
Hello.
> > WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> > .init.text:__alloc_bootmem_node from .text between 'sparse_init' (at
> > offset 0x15c8f) and '__section_nr'
> I took a look at this one.
> You have SPARSEMEM enabled in your config.
> And then I see that in sparse.c we call alloc_bootmem_node()
> from a function I thought should be marked __devinit (it
> is used by memory_hotplug.c).
> But I am not familiar enough to judge if __alloc_bootmen_node
> are marked correct with __init or __devinit (to say
> this is used in the HOTPLUG case) is more correct.
> Anyone?
>
> > WARNING: mm/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to
> > .init.text:__alloc_bootmem_node from .text between 'sparse_init' (at
> > offset 0x15d02) and '__section_nr'
> Same as above....
Memory hotplug code has __meminit for its purpose.
But, I suspect that many other places of memory hotplug code may have
same issue. I will chase them.
BTW, does -mm code checks more strict than stock kernel? I can't see
these warnings in 2.6.21-rc4.....
Bye.
--
Yasunori Goto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists