[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703231112350.6730@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>,
Sid Boyce <g3vbv@...eyonder.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> We should revert that patch and add a "trust_lapic_timer_in_c2"
> commandline option instead. So we are on the safe side.
Damn. I applied your patch, but it breaks on x86-64:
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:271: error: 'local_apic_timer_c2_ok'
undeclared (f irst use in this function)
I really wish we had an x86-64 maintainer that understood that it's
confusing that files in arch/i386/ are also used for arch/x86-64.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists