[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174675437.10840.315.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:43:57 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
Oliver Pinter <oliver.pntr@...il.com>,
Sid Boyce <g3vbv@...eyonder.co.uk>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [1/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 11:28 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Thomas, please fix.
>
> Here's a possible fix. It compiles. And I still wish we had common files.
You beat me by 30 seconds.
> ia64 shouldn't be affected, because ia64 doesn't #define the
> ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3 flag (and then we don't use the "c2_ok" thing
> either.
Right, ia64 does not see it.
> But this is still pretty damn ugly.
Yes it is.
> Maybe a field in "struct acpi_processor" for C2/C3 problems?
Hmm, the acpi processor stuff is modular.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists