linux-kernel - [BUG][x86_64]pci layer may report wrong iomem resources data to drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46042C10.3080407@gmx.de>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:35:44 +0100
From:	thomas schorpp <t.schorpp@....de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG][x86_64]pci layer may report wrong iomem resources data to drivers

lo,

aic7xxx driver mmio / dma on x86_64 linux broken here.

i need some comments and further investigation advice on this:

(resend, mozilla misconfig )

> thomas schorpp wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:28 +0100, thomas schorpp wrote:
>>>>> i agree for this to be a 32bit dma busmaster chip,
>>>>> since pci_resource_flags and lspci say 64bit mem resource type
>>>>>
>>>>> aic7xxx: pci_resource_start fffff000 *maddr 20000 mem64 4
>>>>>
>>
>> static int
>> ahc_linux_pci_reserve_mem_region(struct ahc_softc *ahc,
>>                                 u_long *bus_addr,
>>                                 uint8_t __iomem **maddr)
>> {
>> //      u_long  start;
>>        u_long  len;
>>        int     error;
>>        uint64_t start;
>> ...
>>        printk(KERN_WARNING "aic7xxx: pci_resource_start 0x%llx mem64 0x%lx\n", start, pci_resource_flags(ahc->dev_softc, 1) & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 ); //schorpp
>>        return (error);
>>
>> aic7xxx: pci_resource_start 0xffffff000 mem64 0x4
>> -----------------------------------------------^
>>
>> just to doublecheck the situation, posted lspci already.
>>
>> will check next, if
>>       len = pci_resource_len(ahc->dev_softc, 1);
>>        if (start != 0) {
>>                *bus_addr = start;
>> //              if (request_mem_region(start, 0x1000, "aic7xxx") == 0)
>>                if (request_mem_region(start, len, "aic7xxx") == 0)
>>
>> succeeds.
> 
> no. so the pci layer reports wrong start:
> 
>        start = pci_resource_start(ahc->dev_softc, 1);
>        len = pci_resource_len(ahc->dev_softc, 1);
>        if (start != 0) {
>                *bus_addr = start;
> //              if (request_mem_region(start, 0x1000, "aic7xxx") == 0)
>                if (request_mem_region(start, len, "aic7xxx") == 0)
>                        error = ENOMEM;
>        printk(KERN_WARNING "aic7xxx: req_mem_region 0x%x memlen 0x%lx \n", error, len ); //schorpp
> 
> tom1:~# dmesg |grep aic
> aic7xxx: DMA_32BIT_MASK
> aic7xxx: req_mem_region 0x0 memlen 0x1000
> aic7xxx: pci_resource_start 0xffffff000 *maddr 0x20000 mem64 0x4
> aic7xxx: PCI Device 0:6:0 failed memory mapped test.  Using PIO.
>        aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
> 
> 
>>
>>>>> we've a bug in the x86_64 linux pci config, BIOS is ok, the hardware worked fine in a winxp_x64 test setup a few months ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> will ask LKML.
>>>>>
>>>>> y
>>>>> tom
>>>> sorry, wrong according to http://download.adaptec.com/pdfs/aic7892.pdf.
>>>>
>>>> "66 MHz, 64-bit, PCI interface that
>>>> supports zero wait-state memory;
>>>> also operates on 33 MHz, 32-bit
>>>> PCI busses"
>>>>
>>>> this chip is capable of 64bit addressing, as pci_resource_nnnn (checking this) on x86_64 platform and lspci on x86_64 *and* AMDK7 configured kernels reports, even on PCI/32, right?
>>>> or is it impossible to do multiplexed 64bit mem addressing on PCI/32?
>>>
>>> It can only do 37 bit addressing ... only the aic79xx can do the full 64
>>> bits, so I suspect it should never get a 64 bit BAR, since it wouldn't
>>> be able to decode the full 32 bits.  I can fix the mmio check not to
>>> hang, but the card won't actually work mmio until whatever's assigning
>>> the BAR above 32 bits is fixed (that could either be a kernel PCI bug or
>>> a BIOS bug).
>>>
>>
>> ok, i trust in that. adaptor bios and mainboard bios *are* out, winxp_x64 driver handled all.
>> so agree on kernel pci hal issue.
>> but what for         const uint64_t   mask_39bit = 0x7FFFFFFFFFULL;
>> then?
>>
>>>>
>>>> can adaptec.inc pls comment? since the aha19160 card is still in production state, i assume they want to have a linux x86_64 dma capable driver. so far it is not, or can other users having this card pls confirm my pci system broken?
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>
>> y
>> tom
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/