lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174679344.10840.334.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:49:03 +0100
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
	Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [4/5] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions (v2)

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> 
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
> possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
> 
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
> 
> 
> Subject    : system doesn't come out of suspend  (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
> Submitter  : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il>
>              Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>              Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>              Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
>              Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Status     : problem is being debugged
> 
> 
> Subject    : first disk access after resume takes several minutes
>              ('date' does not advance after resume from RAM, CONFIG_NO_HZ=n)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/117
> Submitter  : Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...lanox.co.il>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>              Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Status     : problem is being debugged

I lost track of Michaels various nested problems.

Michael can you please give a summary on _all_ entries in the
regressions list against Linus latest ?

Thanks,

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ