[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703232129.29331.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:29:29 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request_queue_t depends on CONFIG_BLOCK
On Friday 23 March 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > > Because it is needed in a few places.
> >
> > Is there really any PPC64 specific code which needs <linux/ide.h>
> > (ppc_ide_md is used only by PPC32)?
I suspect that the answer to my question is "not really", if so then
shouldn't the problem that you've encountered be fixed with a one-line patch
which removes <linux/ide.h> include from arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c?
Please try it.
> This is about CONFIG_BLOCK=n, not about arch/... Is all non-driver
> code which has to poke into ide code supposed to put an #ifdef
> CONFIG_IDE around #include <linux/ide.h>?
Such code is _broken_ (as you've just found out) by _implicitly_ depending
on CONFIG_IDE specific data structures and functions. Please note that
<linux/ide.h> is CONFIG_IDE specific and CONFIG_IDE depends on CONFIG_BLOCK=y
so <linux/ide.h> should _not_ be included et all for CONFIG_BLOCK=n case...
PS IDE subsystem has allowed per arch/platform host drivers for years and if
somebody needs help in fixing the existing arch/... (ab)users of <linux/ide.h>
I'll be glad to provide it.
Thanks,
Bart
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists