[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070324223243.GA30060@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:32:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Prevent early access to TSC to avoid crash on TSCless systems
* Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr> wrote:
> >+static int tsc_enabled;
>
> So, now we have tsc_disable, tsc_enabled and tsc_unstable. I can
> understand the latter, but this lacks orthogonality IMHO.
tsc_disable should be renamed to tsc_disable_override or so, to signal
that it's only the mirror of the 'notsc' flag the user passed in over
the boot line.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists