linux-kernel - Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070324184300.3250fab0@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:43:00 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20)

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> wrote:

> Without NCQ, performance is MUCH better on almost every operation, with 
> the exception of 2-3 items.

It depends on the drive. Generally NCQ is better but some drive firmware
isn't too bright and there are probably still cases where we get bad
interactions in the kernel code that want tuning too
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/