linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: avoid sending LOCAL_TIMER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4606CC62.6000006@madrabbit.org>
Date:	Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:24:18 -0700
From:	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: avoid sending LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR IPI to itself

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org> wrote:
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: avoid sending LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR IPI to 
>> itself
>>
>> Ray Lee reported, that on an UP kernel with "noapic" command line 
>> option set, the box locks hard during boot.
> 
> i think this bug deserves a bit more attention, because similar problems 
> could be in other codepaths too.
> 
> the problem here is that we tried to send an IPI to ourselves - which 
> confused Ray's system which has an IO-APIC, but where due to noapic we 
> keep the IO-APIC in its BIOS default.
> 
> this isnt a new problem: the new time code just exposed it more 
> prominently that it was visible before. (the SMP kernel probably would 
> hang in a similar way on Ray's system)

Taking the hint, yes it does. (I'd never had a reason to test it before.)
Booting an SMP kernel without NOAPIC works, with NOAPIC hangs fairly early
on, implying a real fix to my problem belongs down at the arch level, I
suppose.

> i dont see any clear debugging in the IPI code that excludes self-IPIs. 
> I think the only valid way to do that is to use DEST_SELF. Andi?

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/