| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070325202906.GC23487@strauss.suse.de> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:29:06 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] Add IRQF_IRQPOLL_IRQ flag to allow irqpoll * Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> [2007-03-24 00:21]: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > * Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> [2007-03-23 23:15]: > > > On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > > > > > irqpoll is broken on some architectures that don't use the IRQ 0 for the timer > > > > interrupt like IA64. This patch adds a IRQF_IRQPOLL_IRQ flag. > > > > > > emn, please, cannot we come up with a better name - one that doesn't have > > > "IRQ" 3 (!) times in it?... > > > > Well, it was suggested by Andrew. What's your suggestion? > > Purely esthetically (ehm, am I saying that?...) your original suggestion > to use IRQF_IRQPOLL looks better to me. Or even IRQF_POLL, but, maybe, > it's a bit too much of a simplification. I personally don't care very much about the naming. So I think it's Andrews final decision ... Thanks, Bernhard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists