[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070325010709.5d801f1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 01:07:09 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] utsns: fix !CONFIG_UTS_NS behavior
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:39 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
> When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
> not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
>
> Fix this to return -EINVAL so the caller knows his request was denied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
>
> ---
>
> include/linux/utsname.h | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> bc350994ac67df8f1b917f9979c065d87757eabe
> diff --git a/include/linux/utsname.h b/include/linux/utsname.h
> index a4555fe..e10267d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/utsname.h
> +++ b/include/linux/utsname.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ static inline int unshare_utsname(unsign
>
> static inline int copy_utsname(int flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> + if (flags & CLONE_NEWUTS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> return 0;
> }
> static inline void put_uts_ns(struct uts_namespace *ns)
I'm assuming that this is 2.6.21 material.
Please review -mm's merge-sys_clone-sys_unshare-nsproxy-and-namespace.patch
- it probably needs to propagate this fix.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists