linux-kernel - [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Loop rewrite within grow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.83.0703260952560.20524@sigma.j-a-k-j.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:22:13 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"John Anthony Kazos Jr." <jakj@...-k-j.com>
To:	axboe@...nel.dk
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Loop rewrite within grow_buffers for finding
 sizebits

From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <jakj@...-k-j.com>

This patch alters the (do...while) construct to a simple (while) and saves 
one increment operation. It's entirely possible that gcc optimizes away 
the first iteration anyway, but in case it doesn't (and also because it's 
easier to read this way), I think this is better.

Signed-off-by: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <jakj@...-k-j.com>

---

--- linux-2.6.20.4/fs/buffer.c.orig	2007-03-26 09:42:15.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.20.4/fs/buffer.c	2007-03-26 10:10:25.000000000 -0400
@@ -1045,10 +1045,10 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev,
  	pgoff_t index;
  	int sizebits;

-	sizebits = -1;
-	do {
+	sizebits = 0;
+	while ((size << sizebits) < PAGE_SIZE) {
  		sizebits++;
-	} while ((size << sizebits) < PAGE_SIZE);
+	}

  	index = block >> sizebits;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/