[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070326201705.GA14403@pazke.donpac.ru>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:17:05 +0400
From: Andrey Panin <pazke@...pac.ru>
To: Niels de Vos <niels.devos@...cor-nixdorf.com>
Cc: rmk+serial@....linux.org.uk, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for ITE887x serial chipsets
On 085, 03 26, 2007 at 04:17:02PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Super I/O 887x-chipsets of ITE, are currently not completely
> supported. Only parport_pc has the ability to activate the (optional)
> parallel port. This patch adds support for the serial ports.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <niels.devos@...cor-nixdorf.com>
>
> --- linux-2.6.20.3/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c.orig 2007-03-13 19:27:08.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.20.3/drivers/serial/8250_pci.c 2007-03-26 15:42:17.000000000 +0200
> @@ -581,6 +581,174 @@ static int pci_netmos_init(struct pci_de
> return num_serial;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * ITE support by Niels de Vos <niels.devos@...cor-nixdorf.com>
> + */
I think we need a comment here describing how ugly these chips are :)
> +
> +static int __devinit pci_ite887x_init(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + /* inta_addr are the configuration addresses of the ITE */
> + short inta_addr[] = { 0x2a0, 0x2c0, 0x220, 0x240, 0x1E0, 0x200,
> + 0x280, 0 };
static const, please.
> + int ret, i, type;
> + struct resource *iobase;
> +
> + /* search for the base-ioport */
> + i = 0;
> + while (inta_addr[i] && dev->dev.driver_data != NULL) {
> + dev->dev.driver_data = request_region(inta_addr[i], 32,
> + "ite887x");
> + if (dev->dev.driver_data != NULL) {
> + /* write POSIO0R - speed | size | ioport */
> + pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x60,
> + 0xe5000000 | inta_addr[i]);
> + /* write INTCBAR - ioport */
> + pci_write_config_dword(dev, 0x78, inta_addr[i]);
> + ret = inb(inta_addr[i]);
> + if (ret != 0xff) {
> + /* ioport connected */
> + break;
> + }
> + release_resource(dev->dev.driver_data);
> + dev->dev.driver_data = NULL;
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (! inta_addr[i]) {
^
Please remove space after !
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: could not find iobase\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + iobase = dev->dev.driver_data;
> +
> + /* start of undocumented type checking (see parport_pc.c) */
> + type = inb(iobase->start + 0x18);
> + type &= 0x0f;
Why not:
type = inb(iobase->start + 0x18) & 0x0f;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case 0x2:
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "8250_pci: ITE8871 found (1P)\n");
> + break;
> + case 0xa:
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "8250_pci: ITE8875 found (1P)\n");
> + break;
> + case 0xe:
> + printk(KERN_INFO "8250_pci: ITE8872 found (2S1P)\n");
> + return 2;
> + case 0x6:
> + printk(KERN_INFO "8250_pci: ITE8873 found (1S)\n");
> + return 1;
> + case 0x8:
> + printk(KERN_INFO "8250_pci: ITE8874 found (2S)\n");
> + return 2;
> + default:
> + moan_device("unknown ITE887x", dev);
> + }
These printk's are not needed IMHO.
> +
> + /* the device has no UARTs if we get here */
> + release_resource(iobase);
> + dev->dev.driver_data = NULL;
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * activate the UART in the MISCR
> + */
> +static int
> +pci_ite887x_setup(struct serial_private *priv, struct pciserial_board *board,
> + struct uart_port *port, int idx)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct pci_dev *dev = priv->dev;
> + u32 miscr, uartbar, ioport;
> + /* iobase is the private driver_data */
> + struct resource *iobase;
> + /* registers */
> + unsigned short MISCR = 0x9c, UARTBAR = 0x7c;
> + unsigned short PS1BAR = 0x14, POSIO1 = 0x64;
> +
> + /* enable IO_Space bit */
> + u32 POSIO_ENABLE = 1 << 31;
> + /* Decoding speed (1 = slow, 2 = medium, 3 = fast) */
> + u32 POSIO_SPEED = 3 << 29;
> +
> + iobase = (struct resource*) dev->dev.driver_data;
> + if (iobase == NULL) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: iobase is not available\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
Is this check really needed ? I can't see how you can enter this function
with dev->dev.driver_data == NULL.
> +
> + /* read the I/O port from the device */
> + ret = pci_read_config_dword(dev, PS1BAR + (0x4 * idx), &ioport);
> + if (ret) {
Checking return value of pci_read_config_XXX/pci_write_config_XXX is (almost ?)
useless and only complicates things.
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: read error PS%dBAR\n", idx + 1);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> +
> + ioport &= 0x0000FF00; /* the actual I/O space base address */
> + ret = pci_write_config_dword(dev, POSIO1 + (0x4 * idx),
> + POSIO_ENABLE | POSIO_SPEED | ioport);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: write error PSIO%d+\n", idx + 1);
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> +
> + /* write the ioport to the UARTBAR */
> + ret = pci_read_config_dword(dev, UARTBAR, &uartbar);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: read error UARTBAR\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> + uartbar &= ~(15 << (4 * idx)); /* clear half the reg */
> + uartbar |= ioport << (16 * idx); /* set the ioport */
> + ret = pci_write_config_dword(dev, UARTBAR, uartbar);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: write error UARTBAR\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> +
> + /* get current config */
> + ret = pci_read_config_dword(dev, MISCR, &miscr);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: read error MISCR\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> +
> + /* disable interrupts (UARTx_Routing[3:0]) */
> + miscr &= ~(0xf << (12 - 4 * idx));
> + /* activate the UART (UARTx_En) */
> + miscr |= 1 << (23 - idx);
> +
> + /* write new config with activated UART */
> + ret = pci_write_config_dword(dev, MISCR, miscr);
> + if (ret) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "ite887x: write error MISCR\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto release_inta;
> + }
> +
> + /* idx + 1: using POSIO1 and up */
> + return setup_port(priv, port, idx + 1, board->first_offset, 0);
> +
> +release_inta:
> + /* release region again if we get here */
> + release_resource(iobase);
> + dev->dev.driver_data = NULL;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void __devexit pci_ite887x_exit(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + /* free the private driver data */
> + release_resource(((struct resource*) dev->dev.driver_data));
> +}
> +
> static int
> pci_default_setup(struct serial_private *priv, struct pciserial_board *board,
> struct uart_port *port, int idx)
> @@ -654,6 +822,18 @@ static struct pci_serial_quirk pci_seria
> .setup = pci_default_setup,
> },
> /*
> + * ITE
> + */
> + {
> + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_ITE,
> + .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_ITE_8872,
> + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID,
> + .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID,
> + .init = pci_ite887x_init,
> + .setup = pci_ite887x_setup,
> + .exit = __devexit_p(pci_ite887x_exit),
> + },
> + /*
> * Panacom
> */
> {
> @@ -968,6 +1148,7 @@ enum pci_board_num_t {
> pbn_plx_romulus,
> pbn_oxsemi,
> pbn_intel_i960,
> + pbn_ite_887x,
> pbn_sgi_ioc3,
> pbn_nec_nile4,
> pbn_computone_4,
> @@ -1430,6 +1611,15 @@ static struct pciserial_board pci_boards
> },
>
> /*
> + * ITE
> + */
> + [pbn_ite_887x] = {
> + .flags = FL_BASE0 | FL_BASE_BARS,
> + .base_baud = 115200,
> + .uart_offset = 8,
> + },
IMHO this is not needed. You can use pbn_b0_bt_2_115200 or pbn_b0_bt_1_115200,
since quirks will be used anyway.
> +
> + /*
> * NEC Vrc-5074 (Nile 4) builtin UART.
> */
> [pbn_nec_nile4] = {
> @@ -2370,6 +2560,13 @@ static struct pci_device_id serial_pci_t
> { PCI_VENDOR_ID_TOPIC, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TOPIC_TP560,
> PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0,
> pbn_b0_1_115200 },
> + /*
> + * ITE
> + */
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ITE, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ITE_8872,
> + PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> + 0, 0,
> + pbn_ite_887x },
>
> /*
> * IntaShield IS-200
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
pazke@...pac.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists