[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070326205511.GB21991@Ahmed>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:55:12 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@...il.com>
To: Brian Braunstein <brian@...style.com>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>, vtun@...ice.satix.net,
akpm@...l.org, jgarzik@...ox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tun/tap: fixed hw address handling
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:29:29AM -0700, Brian Braunstein wrote:
>
> From: Brian Braunstein <linuxkernel@...style.com>
>
No need for this line. This line is used when you _forward_ another patch
from others. Signed-off-by is enough
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Braunstein <linuxkernel@...style.com>
>
> ---
>
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20.4
>
It's always better to generate the patch against the latest -rc kernel.
> --- linux-2.6.20.4-ORIG/drivers/net/tun.c 2007-03-23
> 12:52:51.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.20.4/drivers/net/tun.c 2007-03-25 00:44:20.000000000 -0700
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
> /*
> * Changes:
> *
> + * Brian Braunstein <linuxkernel@...style.com> 2007/03/23
> + * Fixed hw address handling. Now net_device.dev_addr is kept
> consistent
Your mailer still wrap the long lines mistakenly as it did in the first
version of the patch.
Regards,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists